Risk Infrastructure for
DeFi Yield Markets
Re7 Labs
Sentora
Beefy
Re7 Labs
Sentora
Beefy
Re7 Labs
Sentora
BeefyDiscover protocols
Each protocol is integrated through a dedicated adapter — purpose-built to extract share price accrual, reward decomposition, and on-chain event streams in a format consistent with our risk framework. Coverage spans Ethereum, Base, Arbitrum, Optimism, Polygon, Avalanche, Monad, Plume, and Stable.
Aave
LendingV3 supply-side lending (incl. Lido, Horizon) on Ethereum, Base, Arbitrum, Optimism, Polygon, and Avalanche; V4 on Ethereum.
Morpho
LendingCurated lending vaults (v1, v2) with isolated risk markets on Ethereum, Base, Arbitrum, Monad, and Stable.
Spark
Lending & SavingsSparkLend (v1, Ethereum) and Spark Savings vaults (v2: sUSDS, sUSDC, spUSDC, spUSDT) on Ethereum, Base, Arbitrum, and Optimism.
Compound
LendingCompound V3 (Comet) supply-side lending on Ethereum, Base, and Arbitrum.
Uniswap
LiquidityAMM liquidity provision across V2, V3, and V4 on Ethereum, Arbitrum, and Base.
Yearn
Yield AggregationV2 and V3 vaults on Ethereum, Base, Arbitrum, Optimism, and Polygon.

Beefy
Yield OptimizationV2 auto-compounding vaults on Ethereum, Base, Arbitrum, Optimism, Polygon, and Avalanche.
Nest
Structured YieldNest V1 curated yield vaults on Plume and Ethereum.
Your protocol here?
Contact us →What We Do Differently
No Self-Reported Data
Every metric derives from on-chain state or audited protocol APIs. We verify share price appreciation directly — not projected yields, not protocol marketing numbers.
Multi-Vector Risk Decomposition
Each vault is scored across three independent risk vectors: asset composition, platform security, and governance controls. The framework is deterministic — same inputs, same score, every time.
Realized Performance, Not Projections
APY is calculated from historical share price changes, reflecting actual depositor returns net of fees and slippage. Forward-looking estimates are labeled as such.
Open Methodology
Scoring criteria, vector weights, and tier thresholds are publicly documented. We invite scrutiny — if the model is wrong, we want to know.
Risk Tier Framework
Vaults are classified into three tiers based on a weighted composite score across asset quality, code maturity, and governance structure. The tiers define a risk spectrum, not a recommendation.
Battle-tested code (2+ years), multiple independent audits, timelocked governance. Represents the lowest-risk segment of on-chain yield.
Audited protocols with shorter track records or more permissive governance. Acceptable risk-return for most allocators.
Newer code, limited audit coverage, or concentrated admin powers. Higher yield often compensates for elevated tail risk.
Vector Decomposition
Illustrative breakdown — same vectors as vault detail pages
Illustrative scoring for a Prime-tier lending vault
Operating Principles
The constraints we impose on ourselves to maintain credibility.
No Pay-to-Play
Protocols cannot pay for listings, higher scores, or preferential placement. Revenue never influences risk output.
Data Over Narrative
Scores are derived from measurable on-chain state. Team reputation, social following, and marketing spend are not inputs.
Protocol Agnostic
The same methodology applies to every protocol. No exceptions, no special treatment, no editorial discretion on scores.
Continuous Monitoring
Risk scores update automatically as on-chain conditions change. Incident detection triggers immediate score adjustments.
Full Transparency
Every vector weight, scoring threshold, and tier boundary is publicly documented. Challenge the model, not the output.
Conservative Defaults
Missing data receives the worst-case assumption. An unaudited protocol scores zero on audit density, not 'pending review'.
Start Your Research
Filter by risk tier, chain, protocol, and asset type. Compare risk-adjusted returns across 800 vaults.